Graphology is a science with its basis just like all the other sciences; empirical, and scientific exploration of hypothesis and experimentation. The various character traits that match up with the various graphological traits have been thouroughly tested through the traditional scientific methods.

Graphology is a science and should be best left to experts in the field. It takes years of study and training to become a qualified graphologist. However, there are simple and logical explanations that can show you; how and why graphology works, and the implications for its practical uses.

The following handwritings are samples of famous people. We have provided a mini-analysis of some of the main features of these writings. It is for the purpose of your review. In no way is this to be determined as a complete and in-depth analysis. We have chosen a variety of samples purposely selected for their unique graphology characteristics and others simply because of their fame. Please enjoy these as they are meant only for the purpose of public interest.

The main features of this writing is the marvelous form level, the consistent features like slant, size, and baseline, and the forward and action overall picture. There is strong and straight t-bars, and diagonal strokes. What do these features mean?

Madame Curie has some very interesting qualities with her handwriting. The marvelous use of space shows a person able to organize and plan her work well. She has a lot of physical energy and vitality.

She likes people, but she is rather independent and her personal goals take precedence. Her work was more important than her own physical needs, and she would ignore these needs. There is a great deal of pride in this sample, and she looked to the future with zeal.

She set her goals reasonably high and within reach, and stayed with projects until completion. It was extremely difficult to find her unsure of herself. She was well grounded and very confident in herself and her abilities to eventually accomplish her goals.

She is a quick thinker who relished new ideas and learning. She would be described as a hard driver. This writing is that of an intellect and an accomplisher, and it is sincere.

The striking characteristiscs of Darwin's sample here is the tiny size of the writing, the use of space, the downward trend of the lines, and the lightening speed. The t-bars are long, strong, and overly high; and the overall pressure is inconsistent.

Darwin was a loner, even a hermit. He has the typical aspects of what we call "science writing" which explains the miniscule size. He was driven and set extrememly high goals. Although he was a loner, when he needed to work with someone; it was Darwin who was the boss. He has leadership qualities.

At the time this sample was written, however, he was suffering either from physical disabilities. [Notice the lack of pressure in his PPI] He was a difficult man to encounter, would be impatient, and demanding. He despised waste.

Darwin's intellect would put him in the top 2% of mankind. This is evidenced by the extremely fast writing, creative deviations, and simplified forms. Genius would apply to Darwin. Along with the tremendous intellect, the high t-bars indicate that his intellect rose above that which was known. He was his own thinker, and lived in his own intellectual world with few if any peers.

This sample is written in German, but it is irrelevant. The same scientific rules apply regardless of the language. This may be hard to see, but we see extraordinary form level, tremendous speed, and excellent coordination. This is free hand and fast. The baseline is slightly rising, the spatial arrangement is crowded, but well organized. There is tri-zonal balance, and the upper zone is emphasized.

Like Darwin above, Einstien was a genius, however, Einstein's mind never stopped to breath, and he could fluidly continue a multitude of thoughts non-stop; coordinating and formulating his thoughts while incorporating new ideas into the mix.

Einstein was adventurous, and multi-dimensional. He had an elegance about him, and was able to mix socially. He was not a loner or a hermit like many other scientists. He was a stubborn and defiant, but he was not arrogant. His writing is flexible, and there is release and looseness in the rhythm; so Einstein was not uptight or rigid. He had an easy manner about himself, and while he had a great deal of pride; he did not flaunt his immense intellect. He did get into many arguments, as he was stubborn and stuck to his intellectual ideas. He liked to be around people, and he was constantly active, involved in one project or another. There was no let up in his busy schedule.

Einstein had excellent manual dexterity, but I am uncertain how he displayed it. The overall coordination of the writing betrays a highly coordinated person. He had tremendous optimism, and drove steadily along until he reached his goals.